Saturday, May 31, 2025

Leonor Antunes at Taka Ishii Gallery


(link)

We don't need word pastiche or appropriation anymore because we invented the word "research" which allows influence to become a value-added in PR fodder. Recycled material is now green-washed as "investigation" and we purchase a brown product because of it. Begin to prefer the brown recycled product as nostalgia, as the fan-service and reference-bait of reboots which provide franchise fans with back-patting. The products' comfortization toward viewers becomes congratulatory prize: "I understood that reference." Our nostalgia becomes legitimated. The candy of easter eggs thus becomes a packaged and sold as the whole meal. In art this recycling gets reframed as connoisseurship, knowledge, a one-sided forcible "collaboration" with the past. With "overlooked" histories. The recycling machine is the same. In the cargo-cult era, the detritus of the world is a shopping mall, hang these references like jewelry around your neck. And these are good sculptures. 


See too: The benediction of sign systems. The highest order these relics can obtain is that they get put on Beyonce, as a Christmas tree of our sign systems, collective wreckage, past. The highest order of totems, shown back to us like a lighthouse reorganizing meaning.

Friday, May 30, 2025

SoiL Thornton at Galerie Neu


(link)

Letting the world into the gallery. Sand or baseballs or pompoms. There is no meaning here. There is only the world, which is a shopping mall, which allows purchase of identity. This is good. This is the whatever of perfection: just a world. You can construct your own. The biblical "for dust you are and to dust you will return" is, as far as we know of entropy, scientifically accurate. A sand grain falls for each day in your hourglass. You can go into the world and order pompoms instead. This is the perfection of whatever: your dust. 

Jameson Green at Derek Eller Gallery

(link)

"Pastiche" used to be the incantation to make reuse palatable. (Alongside appropriation and buggery.) Condo, for instance, made his unoriginality acceptable under the guise of ostensible mockery (implying critique, implying meaning). This was a cake-and-eat-it-too situation if there ever was one. Because eventually everyone stops saying the word pastiche and just says Condo- and this is the moment that the art self-justifies, magically, and Condo becomes sui-generis almost tautologically, as if it didn't need Picasso. It no longer looks like a stupid Picasso, it looks like a Condo. It looks like "expensive painting." And so in this way the world has rid itself of the magic incantation pastiche because its the aerosol we now breathe. 

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Patricia Treib at Bureau


(link)

It was the briefest of micro genre, "gentle abstraction," it existed in the cusp of the 2010s between "indexical contingent beside-itself painting," and the "process-based zombie pollockstraction." Artists were sponging soft colors. Treib was their masthead. Then the world changed and we needed figures to stand in for progress. But this was thought to be the future then. Rearming painting as a non-objective babyroom warmth. 

Allison Katz at dépendance

(link)

Painterly "style" is the sediment of an individual's subjectivity accumulating in the granules of their decisions eventually garnering a pile: identity. Look through the glass of another's eyes to see their world through them. We - despite all - trust art to tell us something about its subject. But growing a diaspora of signifiers accumulates a puzzle, a representation adverse to coalescing identity.  Delays coherence in its subject, and creates an anxiety in our trust for the text to tell us something. The actual meaning is in this means to distribute meaning. Fails to deliver on its promise of arriving a destination. To make it feel like there may be some. Content is the red herring. Questions are Frankensteinian death-in-life of art. The game of Clue that never ends.


Sunday, May 25, 2025

Megan Plunkett at Dracula's Revenge


(link)

Because its deputizes us detectives, which gives hope.

"A mystery! A mystery! Where can I lay meaning?"
 
"[Art] is a cultural structure such that its prize is "what it is about." ...  there is something to be unlocked, understood. There is something to be won. This is the belief. ... Painting begins to be prized not for painting but for this mystery. And a mystery, should it not spoil itself, cannot tell you its answer. A mystery instead must load its objects with intent, clues, an ambrosia of noir, an affect of meaning."

Art's interpretability is its highest duty. The crime scene and art are both given this role. The movie detective, the painting, both allow mystery's possibility of answers, thus light the candle that there is an answer.  Provide the possibility to believe in interpretation, giving a truth-potential without having to actualize answers. Interpretation, made as interminable as possible, already provides the same comfort as answers because it enacts the genre, creates art, which assumes meaning. So you must create the fissure, enable the mystery. You enact the murder, censor a part of the sign. Snip the semantic loop. This fissure is the poetic, is its interpretability. It deputizes us detectives, which gives hope, "lights the candle that there is an answer." Leaves the TV on at dusk, a nightlight in darkness. The real mystery is who made it dark.
 

See all: Megan Plunkett

Saturday, May 24, 2025

Thomas Lanigan-Schmidt at Buzzer Reeves


(link)


Writers spend pagespace wondering why Thomas Lanigan-Schmidt hasn't gotten his due. A golden bio, a lovely art, and galleries allot the tentative groupshow, museums retrospectives at secondary locations. Everyone sees success but no one can quite realize it. Is it because we need it to be outsider? Does jankiness only appear polished when found in the rough, feels discovered, rare? Perhaps the inability for Lanigan-Schmidt to find mainstream success is that diamonds in the rough are only valuable for the potential gains. But what if the diamond gains are to remain unrealized, do we still want the stone? Does making outsider art inside kill it?

Faisal Habibi, Dusadee Huntrakul at Roh Projects


(link)

On occasion photographers aren't capturing the art or the gallery or the installation view; they're capturing the air. Some other spectral presence. The photography feels like a horror film. Kubrick. A secret third thing. Right there in front of you and unseeable. Someone call Trisha Donnelly. 

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Aspirated Trash


The stuf expelled from cultural bowels onto streets and corners. Hook it to the intellect, , its virtual cubes, its broadcast mechanism, its hermetic boxes, placing the ass into the head, proffering it, holding it in hands up, saying, "look at this shit." In old Germania the toilets were backwards and you would poop onto a shelf, it served some diagnostic purpose, to look at what you had done, face your fear. To know what you had expelled, reading tea leaves in shallow pools, to determine how our cultural digestion was going.

And so if the landfill is hell and the museum is hermetically sealed heaven, an eternal life (with benevolent steward), art is a practice of purgatorial attempts to suspend its object from the trash, place them onto the helmed cultural ships that navigate time, rather than fall to the abject slaw of whatever-mud at the bottom of the bin.

Like the drug lord, smuggling these objects into blessed afterlife requires you shape an object into what will pass inspection, get through of the security gates of better opportunity, disguise your wares to get there. But whereas the drug lord cares not the for Virgin Marys he casts his product into, Art must believe in desire for its object. Composition is the artist's magic benediction for sending the objects into the "heavenly" afterlife, a means of delivering them to the majority white institutions to get them to care for them in perpetuity. A sort of extended compassion for the derelict neglected of culture, a sympathy moving to material itself, that a world simply would like to rid itself of.  Hooking the hose from the expelling parts of our cultural body to the part that feeds, getting it to eat its underwear.

For Jane Bennett the pathologic hoarder expresses a heightened sensitivity to the world of objects
(and not some vestigial evolutionary trait gone haywire post-scarcity.)  For Bennett's hoarder the world is a little like Toy Story 3. The cheap and mass produced must be saved from the incinerator, the injection molded plastic eyes must identified with, kept indefinitely, inert experienced with connection. (And perhaps the mass production doll replacing the handmade one coincides with a turn from paganist expression to materialist hoarding expression.) Anyway, Art, who feels something towards garbage, attempts smuggling their components out of the trash. The "warm" items of refuse attempt their own repackaging, a reincarnation, second life in the only way objects know how: camouflaging themselves as fresh commodities. Art recasts the trash as flimsy endearing objects that we are made to love, for fear the prying eyes of men who seek to ruin them.

In the real world, this is now a waste management issue called "aspirational recycling" in which "people set aside items for recycling because they believe or hope they are recyclable, even when they aren't." It's a real problem with systemic effects. No longer just trash flooding our excretory paths but hopes clogging our recycling. We don't want plastic in our blood. And these headaches as evidence of anxiety at the hands of trash.

Our aspirations finally lets them levitate, holding them off the ground where they would become trash. Which they, temporarily, suspend from.
Art performs this same relief in seeing the objects cared for, not amassed in landfill graves but given the second life in our carousels.


See too: Yellowing Conceptual Art, Yuji Agematsu, Dozie Kanu, Jessi Reaves, Darren Bader, Gedi Sibony, Laurie Parsons at Museum Abteiberg, Dylan Spaysky, Ser Serpas, B. Wurtz at Richard Telles & ICA LA, Marianne Berenhaut at Island, stuf stuf everywhere,




















Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Alex Olson at Altman Siegel

(link)

The squiggle is the icon of inconsequence, faff, become the middle finger that Laura Owens made her career on. Lily van der Stokker's pink punk. Hanne Darboven just passing the time. But its important to sediment time, stitch yourself to it, say, "I was here."  And Art is a means to attach whatever is in your head to forever, aggrandize thought with color and composition's altar piece. Here, the squiggle. The graffiti cast into time. 

See too: Lily van der Stokker at Koenig & Clinton

Covey Gong, Hong Kong & Robert Zhao Renhui, Singapore & Richard Hawkins, Hong Kong & Wael Shawky, Seoul



The last four shows in Asia. Not sure what to do with this information. (The fifth show was also architecture but in a slightly less dim room.) The question is which outlet is responsible for the creation/trend/trope pipeline. Not that this is. 

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Group show at suns.works


The fireworks punchline of "locally hated" serves as allegory: all verb, no noun. A cymbals crash without setup. There is no punchline, it distends into a question. Who, or what, to be stamped on any of these objects. The lack of place. A metaphor for art, all question, no x. Do you ever feel like you're looking out at an ever receding beach?

Friday, May 16, 2025

Hardy Hill at Fanta-MLN


(link)

Artists' threat on the body is implicit. After centuries of Picasso tearing scalps, Matisse's pipe bent people, Yuskavage's overripe ovoids, Nguyen's surgical cosmetics - we feel the artistic blackmail. It's why Hill's always feel like forensic files to the corpse mangled offscreen. There's something too precious, too sentimental to Hill's eye, to the body that we treat like artistic meat, the grotesque arabesque violence outside.

See too: stress positions of beauty, Tala MadaniViolence Against Faces

Thursday, May 15, 2025

Richard Hawkins at Empty Gallery


(link)

Philosophy buggered its forebears, and Hawkins's art history is a defiled corpse. A past that rots lovely, flesh as sustenance for fish or eyes. The way Hawkins looks at an eternally young Matt Dillon is the way serial killers shampoo their dead victim's hair. Alive to the bearer in its mausoleum, art. Preservation and worm mulch, and maybe no difference between the two for your bride. I wish Hawkins would release books of the collages, the forensic files of his/our art corpse love. Hawkins, let us write the essay.

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Zin Taylor at Susan Hobbs Gallery


(link)

These feel legible. Information is a hardwired forever. A primitive or futuristic ipad tablet, hard to tell which. The Jetsons could meet the Flinstones, their fantasy was the same, "the present" under different aesthetic conditions. The future looks primeval, the iPhone wants to be Kubrick's monolith. Us monkies dancing around its black mirror. High design starts to look like desaturated baby toys. The future will be so simplified, you bang two rocks together and create ️‍🔥, the interface.

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Fred Lonidier at Michael Benevento Gallery


(link)

The hornball photographer was baked into its spread. And Lonidier brings the receipts. Every new pictorial technology comes implicit with promise for men to manifest their dreams, spray their desire into a real, but photography was a gun of mass proportions. Advertising had made capturing women seem photography's very purpose. The sad comedy of this show, the hard sale to men, a tool for their desire, it was never more explicit. Look at the contact prints, Luncheon on the Grass became a documentary, became the norm, became a DIY kit packaged and sold for the everyman. 

(There's enough ideas here for four shows, maybe four careers at this point. Artists today are so afraid of explicit meaning, we've given in to so much "anonymous material" but Lonidier is proof that explicitness doesn't close meaning. The walls pinned with straightforward questions are surely redundant to the anonymous material of art's white walls glowing the same question, but the hamfisted redundancy is far more interesting, alienating, fun even, than the "mystery" of any noodly object on the floor. There's stakes and they're real. )




Djordje Ozbolt at Herald St


(link)

Painting is a basic technology for images. But you can imagine anything and you can paint it. Leave it right there for the viewer. Every new technology promises the printing of our dreams. AI will render you anything! We get a lot of what already existed, boobied fantasy women. A bird smoking. But they already do that in the real world, I saw it on instagram. Somehow the painting of three birds standing on each other comes off as far stranger. 

Monday, May 12, 2025

Magnus Andersen at Kunsthalle Rønnebæksholm

(link)

It is aversive. The look of a children's book you wouldn't buy for your children. Claymation figures with marfan syndrome, frosted fruit flavors, excess 80's patterning, the coyly simplistic composition.  It's all so mildly repulsive. Like a rug covered toilet. So mild. A cartoon pleasantry does beckon creepiness. And the predator pike finally snatching a duckling comes as relief. There is blood in these walls. The smiling creatures can be killed with an axe. Relief.

See too: Magnus AndersenMagnus Andersen at Neue Alte Brücke(2)Magnus Andersen at Neue Alte Brücke & Dorothy Iannone at Air de Paris

Sunday, May 11, 2025

Group Show at Croy Nielsen


(link)

Against yesterday's joy, today's lethargy. Drear. Anhedonia. The color drains. The puddles accumulate. A swamp. A stage, it all becomes a theater of sad. It feels apt.

Saturday, May 10, 2025

Wayne Koestenbaum at Gattopardo


(link)

It's really a great press release. Acknowledging the art is for Instagram. Still contain life. A late-career career. Fun is generally pestilence to art. (A confusion/fear of being the quasi-art of Meow Wolf, Museum of Ice Cream, all those museum courtyard carnivals.) Halpern makes the case for the shape a giggle makes. So nice to not be jaded. Or, more, believe it possible. "Henri Matisse painted pretty pictures during one of history’s ugliest eras." Early on I was haunted by a Kostenbaum paragraph about Warhol's nose sanding. A flippant aside of his, personal, visual struggles. Years later haunted by a piano jingle casually performed about cubed meats. Koestenbaum can haunt. Its in the ability to perhaps cast aside, continue on, in the face of it. 

Friday, May 9, 2025

Gordon Matta-Clark: NYC Graffiti Archive at White Columns

(link)

An artist's archive collecting an aesthetic, a moment, one that is disappearing, unsanctioned, unprotected. There is so much preservation today. Embalmed in your screen. Documentation as Matrix-like life-in-death existence, serving the robots overlords. Graffiti is tears in the rain, a voiceless nameless people irrupting onto a city, only to be washed away by oceans of solvent, grey paint. ACER's bomb on the New Museum one of the greatest works of institutional critique of this century, encapsulated by a meme: "everyone wants graffiti until it's time to do graffiti shit." The museum, ostensible archive, could not delete its message fast enough. Graffiti must arrive in the safe digestion of another. Distanced and morbid. But it is the bathroom walls we must protect. Like CAWD. 

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Tara Walters at Nina Johnson


Sympathy at their wimpiness, like neoteny in humans, a neoteny in painting, the painting looks up at you with wide glassy eyes, pleading love. Babies are by definition, pathetic, we care for their inadequacy, pin their drawings to our wall, give them a gold star, knowing full well "we could totally do that." But that's not why we love them. Their innocence, that you could crush them. The Eden of innocence we cannot get back to, but every modernist inhaling enough rags to make them light headed enough to try. 

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Simon Denny at Bill's PC


(link)

Museum's tweens are now armed with point-and-shoot cameras. They dangle from wrist straps like oversized jewelry, flashing, the aughts are so back. Turning the aesthetic into a tradeshow display for itself - the kids would love this. Objects out of time. Seduction out of time. All candy. Denny's are from 2010. Now in 2025 in western Australia. Surfaces simply gliding along. Aesthetics move the same as objects. You wear them around wrist like jewelry. Isn't that what Denny does?

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Philipp Timischl at Museum of Contemporary Art Belgrade

(link)

"the rearranged parts of the cultural casino, cut from and placed into its altars, deranged artifacts. "

Our world's sign systems are chaos. And, artistically, we're still in our post-Harrison supernova fallout: artists picking up the world's detritus and assembling it on art's altars for your consideration: "culture what could it mean?" Culture, meanwhile, doesn't give a fuck about coherence, meaning. (Incoherence instills lack, creates desires, instigates sales.) The most successful artists of recent simply give in to this surface, incoherence and irony, and turn it into big stupid jewels/carnivals of it, say Jordan Wolfson or Anne Imhof. Maybe Koons. But putting a lovely frame around it works just as well. Go out into the world with your scissors and excise what is interesting. Print it on our cave walls. We travel to the caves to see this ritual performed. 

See too: Philipp Timischl at Neue Alte BrückePhilipp Timischl at LAYR Coburgbastei, “A Love Letter to a Nightmare” at Petzel

Monday, May 5, 2025

Jeremy Glogan at Jenny's

(link)

Overhearing a child in a museum point at a Renoir and yell "it has special effects!" Often attempts to manufacture effects in painting beget a deployment of niche technique abused systematically to stand in for magic. Not always, it's just sometimes hard to tell which. 

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Past:

"And one of the joys of a vernacular functionalism is the endlessly alternative, the elsewise arrival at a similar solution. ... Kanu's project might be a similar mining of alternatives to an already existing solution: selling the artworld what it wants. "

"Art has no surprise, all subversion is already accepted. But furniture is a form with expectations and so allows for subversion. ...wonky, impractical, painful, these are the tools of the artist/designer. ... The old Indiana Jones slight of hand, exchanging heavy trash for gold. But Indy made that academic gaff, mistaking volume for weight, having never really held gold, didn't know the exchange rate. Then the temple collapses. 

"The dust forms a question for archeologists. And then how you felt about the temple to begin with."

Full: Dozie Kanu at Project Native InformantDozie Kanu at Performance Space

Saturday, May 3, 2025

Michaela Eichwald at Reena Spaulings Fine Art

"But Eichwald finds the edge, the moment before a Frankenthaler turns into a dog's sick. 

The neanderthal nappie merchants - Joe Bradley, Josh Smith, et al - attempted proving beyond doubt: paint just always looks good. But Eichwald makes one really sit in its question. "
The scatalalogical mess used to be a lot funner. It reified what the idiot savants of abstraction were spraying. Their nappies. Jackson Pollock from a different less sublimated orifice. "The brown rope that tethers us to earth." But grown tired of being forced to look into the toilet and see the sublime. Once, in the Schipol airport restroom hearing a man inside a stall groaning, "Bitte! Bitte!" Ha ha, too bad we weren't in germany, I would have liked to read the kritical text sprayed. 

See too: All Michaela EichwaldCalvin Marcus at Clearing