![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG9nY7wvpcNOAgLonr24EbipH8-wXHaRUBuaop5Dy_KvMR5WUpwXlEPGyMfGzCl0IaJV7EvUMi10uIkioqHDhytm63VEJYcEEMjtiYkek86LLhASWVhc3c_6yG-7aRV8Tf0WDh4YXVj7zi/s640/Sherrie+Levine+at+David+Zwirner.jpg)
(link)
Images both are and aren't generic, even the most bland are still specific singular instances of a larger regime of similar images, like stock photography's multi-cultural workplace theme. Images become soft by their ubiquity, their dispersal, a continual re-staging erodes their specific edges to become some semi-solid substance of genericness. And any new instances are based on the patterns of the last one. Iconic photographs are often predicated on a tension of specificity given to a ubiquitous theme, a concerned mother, a puddle jump, a flag raising, each iconic image eventually returning to some blank marker of vague icon. Each remembrance is like an appropriation, a rephotographic theft of its specificity to soften it back to the soup of ubiquity, of theme, of trope, back to stock image.
See too: Sherrie Levine at Simon Lee