![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO0899f5DS4FyIp8vgOrCR4ZNGCWAYLMsZpKZtm9ZLroxQINLf4xN6FOIIVNrTbAM_zjluz-dMGQopAPff1VQhsNZMvYw2eU-ggS2h6Ug-s9HvUFv0o6f7SX37rc6muBfeJ263n-nu35Ez/s640/Jacqueline+Humphries+at+Modern+Art.jpg)
(link)
the more vulgar excesses of Humphries's paint always excused by its obliviousness to the demands of "making a painting." Humphries's almost without-composition but still composed, paintings like an accident, car or bed sheet. And these are readymade, the previous paintings reduxed with the latest deployment: ASCII printing. And so Humphries' drip, brushstroke, mark, neither expressive nor quotational of expression, paint is instead already perfectly dumb. This separates them from the hordes of zombies: no search for brains. Instead the cannibal-without-purpose seems pleasant after so many decades of painting's conceptual juicing. Like Richter whose painting exists in the netherworld of a stupid transcendence, instead just give us what we want, paint, flesh, dumbly.
see too: Jacqueline Humphries at Carnegie Museum of Art