![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7NFxYPLCbL8E5R4LFVbN7xSxI4AeRSwgN9c2NtnTGmt3wWxbjMipBH3lthc6ghINIe4i4IBj_i0v2Zi4LRx82GypLgzZf_N0AxKYMuVA10ygHlTrQaRMEdlDAPcN4mea7XfWpsne513ow/s640/Ad+Minoliti+at+Agustina+Ferreyra.jpg)
(link)
An argument had, can a triangle be a funny triangle?, formal objects able to emote subjectivity, or like Mondrian or af Klint a channeling of forces beside themselves. Can objects transacted through history or persons become grounds for conducting identities, become gendered. "How would an aphrodisiac painting look?"